Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;lkeigwin, post: 1399265, member: 30400&quot;]I&#039;ve owned Porsches for 40 years so I&#039;m going to try to help you a little. I&#039;m guessing by your forum name you are an enthusiast. The rest of you, forgive me.</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;...an attempt to decrease the angle that a reader may have to deviate itself towards something that isn&#039;t actually conveyed&quot; is not just convoluted and cryptic. It is some of the worst writing I&#039;ve ever encountered. A reader deviates itself toward an angle to misconstrue your meaning? BTW, is &quot;itself&quot; the reader or the angle?</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;...I use words that only have two or three different senses.&quot; Instead, write a message that has only one meaning for everyone.</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;Within my manner to ratiocinate this occurrence, there isn&#039;t sufficient flexibility to abandon my consistent faith.&quot; You are trying to say you gave the PF67 grade reasonable consideration but couldn&#039;t agree with it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Use words and structure that make your message clear. That will get you the respect of your readers and, let&#039;s hope, an answer to your question.</p><p><br /></p><p>Remember, the principle of KISS applies as much to communication as it does to engineering products.</p><p>Lance.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in