1961 cent

Seriously, what's your problem? Do you think this makes you seem intelligent, or are you just trolling and trying to make everyone angry?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I highly doubt this would receive a PR/PF 64-65 from PCGS or NGC. 66 maybe, but would be based on the coin and not the service. The notion many people have that anything slabbed by ANACS is or can be overgraded is hogwash. This is not to say they do not have their issues and blown calls (they do just as does NGC and PCGS) but there are a heck of a lot of very nice, properly graded coins in ANACS holders.

I would like to know what you see or what makes you think the OP's coin "might" come in at such a lower grade.

 

Or he want's us to think he is some kind of robot with artificial intelligence.

 

Euh, inquiline, are you seeking camorra? There isn't an inconvenience with the possibility of a unipersonal rancor within some of your memories. If my words don't amalgamate themselves as an orthographic/grammatical, peccant error, then your apparent reproach will never traverse the grade of aperture through the "acceptable" flexibility of fundaments pertaining to the English language. You have been attempting to instill an apocryphal strategy that only divagates itself towards impudence. I apologize...though your words might be lauded, they will never ameliorate a libelous pronouncement from your part. #accoladetranquility


Salutations.

Postscript (exclusively for moderator): this post represents my current thoughts that weren't supposed to be divulged. In the initiative sentence, the disrespectful consultation opens itself too much. The principal, unnecessary message involutes itself during the posterior sentences. In any way, I suppose that any modification would reflect a sense of calmness...an admirable sense of calmness.

 

Thank you for answering my question and letting me know you are a troll.