Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 7487257, member: 15199&quot;]Hi, Tin_Man_0, </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; I think the 5th photo from the bottom gives the most info. Here both the date and RPM show. As was said above, if it is an RPM, it is a small one.&nbsp; But on the &quot;9&quot;, with this photo showing the whole number, notice the thickness is almost exactly the same thickness all along the number, including both ends, so any appearance of a dividing line can be considered to be just in appearance or at best a tiny machine doubling as a true doubling would cause the entirety to be wider. Also as you mentioned the &#039;0&#039; , notice that when we look at the whole number , it&#039;s width also stays almost the same thickness throughout, so the line through the middle of it divides it into sections that are only about half the width of the whole thing, so it is the same as the 9. And as others have said, very good photos to verify. Sorry it doesn&#039;t&nbsp; seem to be a true DD. IMO, Jim[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in