Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;John Burgess, post: 7323975, member: 105098&quot;]there&#039;s your options on the DDR:</p><p><a href="http://www.varietyvista.com/11%20Franklin%20Halves/DDRs%201960.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.varietyvista.com/11%20Franklin%20Halves/DDRs%201960.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.varietyvista.com/11 Franklin Halves/DDRs 1960.htm</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I agree with PR65. Middle of the road Proof Franklin half, although PCGS or NGC might make it PR64, they are harsher in my opinion than ANACS is. But I think ANACS grades fairly.</p><p><br /></p><p>Gonna be honest with ya, I see frankins like this occasionally on Ebay, I&#039;m not a fan of this, reverse is spotty around the edge, obverse is streaky. It&#039;s not going through the color shifts you&#039;d expect....and just went to dark in those areas.</p><p><br /></p><p>I don&#039;t see them like this in the OMP, so I think it&#039;s some sort of an aftermarket set holder that did it, maybe the cardboard inset to one of the lens holders..... </p><p><br /></p><p>my opinion if you are in the market for The DDR, then these other factors are a consideration, but they aren&#039;t the main selling point, the DDR is.</p><p><br /></p><p>Up to you on the eye appeal, and if you don&#039;t like it, that&#039;s not gonna change later on at least, not without a crack out and a dip. </p><p>the black streaks are surface toning in my opinion, Silver(I) oxide if I took a educated guess and not the usual overall hazy toning that rainbows.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in