Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;John Burgess, post: 4947081, member: 105098&quot;]Not sure. on cuds-on-coins, in nickels 1950-1969, there&#039;s nothing like yours exactly... yet this is a common area for die chips from the letters and numbers to the rim, or small cuds and even cuds on coins seems to be on the fence on if it&#039;s cud or chips, because some are filed as cuds but clearly they are chips.</p><p>check out CU-5-1960D-08 to 11</p><p><a href="http://cuds-on-coins.com/jeffersonh-nickel/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://cuds-on-coins.com/jeffersonh-nickel/" rel="nofollow">http://cuds-on-coins.com/jeffersonh-nickel/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>like I said, it&#039;s not yours, yours has similarities but big differences, like more of &quot;it&quot; but not as defined.</p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe it&#039;s a lot of die chips on the edge of the die but the collar was still good? that area is tight, in fact if the coin had more wear that takes down the rim, you wouldn&#039;t even see that anymore.&#039;</p><p><br /></p><p>fred may also be on track here, folded over rim finning.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in