Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1958 P doubled die obverse variety
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="BooksB4Coins, post: 2256875, member: 36230"]With all due respect to you and Mr. Stanton, even if an attempt was made at including more common varieties, those listed still represent only a tiny fraction of what was known at the time of printing. This certainly isn't a bad thing per se - a CPG-style reference listing even a majority would comprise near countless volumes and is wholly unrealistic - but is true and is something that, particularly newer collectors, should know. I remember Mr. Wexler once mentioning to me that there are over 100 different DDRs for the 1964 Philly cent alone, yet how many are listed in cherrypickers... without checking, perhaps two or three? Sure, most are going to be very minor and of no real interest even to many variety collectors, but they're still legitimate varieties nonetheless.</p><p><br /></p><p>Please understand that this nor my previous post was intended as a slight to the books - they're certainly fine references, albeit ones with clear limitations and unfortunate omissions - but they're not definitive variety references, even if a number of more common ones have been included.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="BooksB4Coins, post: 2256875, member: 36230"]With all due respect to you and Mr. Stanton, even if an attempt was made at including more common varieties, those listed still represent only a tiny fraction of what was known at the time of printing. This certainly isn't a bad thing per se - a CPG-style reference listing even a majority would comprise near countless volumes and is wholly unrealistic - but is true and is something that, particularly newer collectors, should know. I remember Mr. Wexler once mentioning to me that there are over 100 different DDRs for the 1964 Philly cent alone, yet how many are listed in cherrypickers... without checking, perhaps two or three? Sure, most are going to be very minor and of no real interest even to many variety collectors, but they're still legitimate varieties nonetheless. Please understand that this nor my previous post was intended as a slight to the books - they're certainly fine references, albeit ones with clear limitations and unfortunate omissions - but they're not definitive variety references, even if a number of more common ones have been included.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1958 P doubled die obverse variety
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...