Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;baseball21, post: 3200497, member: 76863&quot;]I&#039;ve yet to see real evidence it was ever a 66 but even if it was that doesn&#039;t tell the whole story.&nbsp; It very easily could have been graded before + grading ever happened so 66 or 66+ is irrelevant if plus grades were not a thing first time around. </p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s not a secret that eye appeal means more in grading now that a long time ago, so yes certain things will upgrade from eye appeal while other things that were technically graded will downgrade. </p><p><br /></p><p>I don&#039;t have a problem at all trying to learn more, my problem is with some of the &quot;experts&quot; that have never seen the coin and will freely trash it when they would never play at that level and think they can know everything from a picture. </p><p><br /></p><p>My basic point was just that be careful what you listen to, there&#039;s a lot of supposed world class graders on forums that aren&#039;t even close to that.&nbsp; Some of those haven&#039;t had experience for a decade with it.&nbsp; Real world grading experience does mean something and this idea that some push that it&#039;s super lose is not reality.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Actual world class graders that have seen it in hand not only gave a grade but then CAC agreed as did the buyers who saw it in hand, that&#039;s multiple real experts.&nbsp; Anyone can type on a forum and that&#039;s exactly what happens a lot</p><p><br /></p><p>They knew what they were doing when they put those bids in[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in