Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 428016, member: 4920&quot;]Oh shoot, I&#039;m <i>very </i>sorry, I didn&#039;t mean to <i>mislead</i>! It&#039;s a raw job. </p><p><br /></p><p>I was looking at some of the slabbed ones over the past several months on Heritage, and wherever else I could find them, and the &quot;milk spots&quot; are distracting, for one, and, I&#039;m not very good with the overall appearance of <i>any </i>of those, either, to tell you the truth. You&#039;ve seen one, you&#039;ve seen &#039;em all. They all have hits and the same uneven, or spotty, luster, which is also kind of unappealing, to me. E Pluribus, though, is the same on all of these...and, personally, I grade this is a 65+, when rated against that cross-section, I&#039;ve seen. What I wanted to know was how you guys rated the toning (at least, from what I could capture of it...the deep blue captured a little flat, I have to admit), but, also, specifically, what problems and/or problem areas you saw on the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m good with your grades, though, don&#039;t think I&#039;m being critical of those. You guys are better at that than me, anyway (I admit, I&#039;m not that good on Lincolns). Thanks, again...everyone![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in