Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1957 Jefferson Nickel: Artificial or Natural Toning?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 7414929, member: 15309"]How could they definitively call a coin AT? They know nothing about the coin before they view it. And I knew what they were going to do going in, I told everyone all three coins were gonna go QT, but the payoff if one straight graded was just to good to not try.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here I agree with you, I think they should label the coin MS6X details Questionable color rather than the generic UNC Details.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I will take that bet. All three coins are QT to my eyes and the two of them are blatantly AT. I don't submit enough coins to PCGS for them to check my history for submitting toned coins. I don't think they are trying to scam me by not doing their job, in fact, I think they did their job by grading all three QT.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>And that is why I took a shot, cause they do let some AT slip by. The submission was 30 coins and there were other toned coins from multiple denominations in the submission. These were the only ones to get bagged for QT.</p><p><br /></p><p>We can speculate about why these coins came back QT, or we can apply Occam's Razor and deduce that the coins came back QT because they are QT.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 7414929, member: 15309"]How could they definitively call a coin AT? They know nothing about the coin before they view it. And I knew what they were going to do going in, I told everyone all three coins were gonna go QT, but the payoff if one straight graded was just to good to not try. Here I agree with you, I think they should label the coin MS6X details Questionable color rather than the generic UNC Details. I will take that bet. All three coins are QT to my eyes and the two of them are blatantly AT. I don't submit enough coins to PCGS for them to check my history for submitting toned coins. I don't think they are trying to scam me by not doing their job, in fact, I think they did their job by grading all three QT. And that is why I took a shot, cause they do let some AT slip by. The submission was 30 coins and there were other toned coins from multiple denominations in the submission. These were the only ones to get bagged for QT. We can speculate about why these coins came back QT, or we can apply Occam's Razor and deduce that the coins came back QT because they are QT.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1957 Jefferson Nickel: Artificial or Natural Toning?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...