Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 4828313, member: 15309&quot;]Is the toning on the 1957 Jefferson Nickel shown below natural, artificial, or something in between?&nbsp; Please vote in the attached poll to express your opinion using one of the following 5 categories.</p><p><br /></p><p>1)&nbsp; Natural Toning (NT):&nbsp; The toning is 100% original and the coin would definitely grade problem free by NGC or PCGS.</p><p><br /></p><p>2)&nbsp; Market Acceptable Toning (MA):&nbsp; While not definitively natural, the toning is still market acceptable and most likely would grade problem free by NGC or PCGS.</p><p><br /></p><p>3)&nbsp; Questionable Toning (QT):&nbsp; While not definitively artificial, the toning is not market acceptable and most likely would be graded as a problem coin for questionable toning by NGC or PCGS.</p><p><br /></p><p>4)&nbsp; Artificial Toning (AT):&nbsp; The toning is 100% artificial and the coin would definitely grade as a problem coin for artificial toning by NGC or PCGS.</p><p><br /></p><p>5)&nbsp; Show results (IDK):&nbsp; If you don&#039;t know which category to assign this coin, or are unsure of your grading skills with relation to the originality of toning, please select this option.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/E1tmaQ5.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As always, comments welcome.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in