Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Puddin&#039;Farts, post: 3379492, member: 100439&quot;]The very first picture that had the comparison photo was the 901 from coinfacts on top and mine on the bottom which shows the misplaced D pretty well. My other question was if the inside line on the wing was a die crack or gouge, which you just cleared up to be a possible strike through.</p><p>&nbsp;Is the crack you&#039;re referring to found on the 901? If so, there&#039;s a huge crack, but the Tailfeathers look nothing like the AU55 example they also have pictured. </p><p>My question regarding the 901 was that I was wondering if that example was misattributed or if it is legitimate? I believe mind to definitely be a 501 misplaced MM, but from the photos of the 901 example, it also looks very similar. I searched Coneca but they don&#039;t list any markers aside from the die states.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in