Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrshmooze, post: 1588330, member: 38868&quot;]<b>New 1956-d rpm</b></p><p><br /></p><p><b>Here is my find to start...</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b></b>[ATTACH]220964.vB[/ATTACH]&nbsp; Notice South and West (to me anyway) it looks like the outline of a D.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]220965.vB[/ATTACH]&nbsp; Here is another view.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1956 RPM-008 has a outline of a D directly south, so it isn&#039;t that one.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is pic.&nbsp; [ATTACH]220966.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>My other thought was the D/D/S OMM2</p><p><b>Background and Picure</b></p><p>1956 D/D/S WOMM # 1</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Fivaz Stanton Numbers: Not Listed</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Breen:&nbsp; not listed</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Coneca:&nbsp; RPM #12</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Wexler: WOMM-001</p><p>The 1956 D/D/S&nbsp; WOMM-001 is a very </p><p>interesting variety.&nbsp; The coin exhibits a </p><p>D punched almost directly over a D </p><p>with an S mintmark punched lightly </p><p>northeast of the D&#039;s.&nbsp; The parts of the S </p><p>that touch the D&#039;s can be seen best.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This is a controversial OMM because of </p><p>the weakness of the S mintmark.&nbsp; </p><p>Coneca still lists this variety as rpm#12.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The complete outline of the S can be </p><p>seen only on late die stages.&nbsp; Late die </p><p>stage coins are very scarce and </p><p>demand a much higher premium.&nbsp; On </p><p>early and middle die stages, die </p><p>scratches can be seen running </p><p>southwest to northeast across the date </p><p>and mintmark.&nbsp; </p><p>In late die stages, these </p><p>die scratches are gone.&nbsp;&nbsp; This coin is known as 1956 RPM #12, </p><p>1956 D/D/S OMM#2, or WOMM-001.&nbsp; </p><p>Do not confuse this coin with </p><p>WDMM-001.&nbsp; This coin is the #4 most wanted in The </p><p>Complete Price Guide and Cross </p><p>Reference to Lincoln Cent Mint Mark </p><p>Varieties by Brian Allen and John </p><p>Wexler.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]220967.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]220968.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>It looked to low to be this one and again I noticed an outline of a D below.&nbsp; Everyone&#039;s Thoughts here would be appreciated.&nbsp; Thanks[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in