Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrbrklyn, post: 226578, member: 4381&quot;]Well, sorry for the confussion.&nbsp; What I was saying is that the coins proof, as you can see in the image, has a lot of detail in the hair of Franklin, detail that they must have none would never be vissible in a business strike.&nbsp; As time goes by, this gets even worse.&nbsp; The coin relly suffered in poor design, IMO, which becomes even more apearent when you look 1960 newly engraved proof.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>So, OK, if the original suffers such a mistake, why not make a correction in 1960 at least?</p><p><br /></p><p>Ruben[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in