Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrbrklyn, post: 270553, member: 4381&quot;]I think that rarety is not enough to create demand.&nbsp; There are countless examples of coins where VG examples are actually harder to find and MS63s.&nbsp; &lt;shrug shoulders&gt;</p><p><br /></p><p>There are more 1909 -s because the deamnd for them is great.&nbsp; How many requests are for 1909-s at a coin show rather than a 1972-D Lincoln?</p><p><br /></p><p>To be fair, I think you&#039;d have to look at 1950 coins as not being all that modern, and nickels are nickels.</p><p><br /></p><p>In terms of post 1964 clad coins I do believe that there are exceptions to this rule.&nbsp; I do believe that High Grade Kennedy&#039;s, Eisenhower Dollars, untarnished Sac&#039;s, super high grade&nbsp; modern errors, and maybe Susan B&#039;s will become more collectable.</p><p><br /></p><p>Proof Sets and some Mint Sets also will gain value over time.</p><p><br /></p><p>The government did everything to make the coins viewed as worthless utilities used for transactions and to emphasis the ink in a passbook savings book as a real value.&nbsp; In that it succeeded and boring ugly designs which were poorly struck was a large part of that.&nbsp; I don&#039;t see many people buying boxes of Washign Quarters in search of a 1982 MS 62.&nbsp; But that is just one man&#039;s opinion.</p><p><br /></p><p>Ruben[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in