Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1955 DDO value
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="ifthevamzarockin, post: 8297066, member: 135372"]The problems I was seeing with the OP's original photo were.....</p><p><br /></p><p>The highlighted lines on OD of GOD appeared to be on top of the main design rather than behind it.</p><p><br /></p><p>The highlighted line in WE appeared to be a straight thin cut and on a genuine one it is a little wider at the bottom and tappers to the top. Many of the counterfeits have a thin cut line here. </p><p><br /></p><p>The bowtie looked tripled rather than doubled.</p><p><br /></p><p>The last 5 appeared to have too tight of a curl in the lower loop.</p><p><br /></p><p>The ear hole appeared too large.</p><p><br /></p><p>In the new photos things look a bit different. </p><p><br /></p><p>The areas of the O & D now appear behind the main design as they should.</p><p> </p><p>It's hard to see but the space between the WE appears it may be slightly wider at the bottom as it should be.</p><p><br /></p><p>The bowtie appears doubled rather than tripled.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 5 appears like it might be PMD and lighting that made the curl appear too tight.</p><p><br /></p><p>The ear hole still appears kinda funky but may be grease fill or some other problem. Better photos would be needed.</p><p><br /></p><p>Some of the other details still look off but could easily be the photo quality.</p><p><br /></p><p>The marks on the reverse may have been something on the coin that fell off or was brushed off by PCGS and lighting & poor photos made it look like part of the coin. The OP confirmed it was on the coin.</p><p>The marks on the reverse would have nothing to do with authenticity they only raised questions confirming it is the same coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am only trying to help the OP understand how bad photos can make things appear wrong and that is what I was seeing and maybe what others were seeing.</p><p>If you give us photos that make it appear to have problems we are going to say it's a problem coin. </p><p><br /></p><p>At this point I am leaning more & more to the genuine side and that I was wrong about the authenticity. Better photos and a better attitude would be appreciated from the OP. You have to help us to help you. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Still not sure how it made it through with the green stuff on it but congrats. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1467314[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="ifthevamzarockin, post: 8297066, member: 135372"]The problems I was seeing with the OP's original photo were..... The highlighted lines on OD of GOD appeared to be on top of the main design rather than behind it. The highlighted line in WE appeared to be a straight thin cut and on a genuine one it is a little wider at the bottom and tappers to the top. Many of the counterfeits have a thin cut line here. The bowtie looked tripled rather than doubled. The last 5 appeared to have too tight of a curl in the lower loop. The ear hole appeared too large. In the new photos things look a bit different. The areas of the O & D now appear behind the main design as they should. It's hard to see but the space between the WE appears it may be slightly wider at the bottom as it should be. The bowtie appears doubled rather than tripled. The 5 appears like it might be PMD and lighting that made the curl appear too tight. The ear hole still appears kinda funky but may be grease fill or some other problem. Better photos would be needed. Some of the other details still look off but could easily be the photo quality. The marks on the reverse may have been something on the coin that fell off or was brushed off by PCGS and lighting & poor photos made it look like part of the coin. The OP confirmed it was on the coin. The marks on the reverse would have nothing to do with authenticity they only raised questions confirming it is the same coin. I am only trying to help the OP understand how bad photos can make things appear wrong and that is what I was seeing and maybe what others were seeing. If you give us photos that make it appear to have problems we are going to say it's a problem coin. At this point I am leaning more & more to the genuine side and that I was wrong about the authenticity. Better photos and a better attitude would be appreciated from the OP. You have to help us to help you. ;) Still not sure how it made it through with the green stuff on it but congrats. ;) [ATTACH=full]1467314[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1955 DDO value
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...