Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1955/5 Cent?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 304071, member: 66"]1955 "shift cent" is an obsolete term once used to describe the 1955 DDO cent. It was common back int he 1950's and early 60 because most people did not understand how the coin was created. Some thought that the doubled image was caused by the die or mold "shifting" while it was being made (Yes some people thought coins were made by a molding in process. Few collectors really knew much about the minting process.). Others thought it was caused by a double striking with the die shifting between strikes. In either case there was a "shift" and the coins came to be called 1955 shift cents.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you read general coin books written in the 40's through 60's you will find a lot of strange things in them, especially in relation to error coins. One of my all time favorites is "suction marks" where the explanation was that the intense vacuum created as the dies pulled apart from the coin actually "Sucked" the designs from one side of the coin through to the other side. In 1929 Biestle, in his book on half dollar varieties, called them ackcidefects. Today, we call them clashmarks. Dies do not suck![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 304071, member: 66"]1955 "shift cent" is an obsolete term once used to describe the 1955 DDO cent. It was common back int he 1950's and early 60 because most people did not understand how the coin was created. Some thought that the doubled image was caused by the die or mold "shifting" while it was being made (Yes some people thought coins were made by a molding in process. Few collectors really knew much about the minting process.). Others thought it was caused by a double striking with the die shifting between strikes. In either case there was a "shift" and the coins came to be called 1955 shift cents. If you read general coin books written in the 40's through 60's you will find a lot of strange things in them, especially in relation to error coins. One of my all time favorites is "suction marks" where the explanation was that the intense vacuum created as the dies pulled apart from the coin actually "Sucked" the designs from one side of the coin through to the other side. In 1929 Biestle, in his book on half dollar varieties, called them ackcidefects. Today, we call them clashmarks. Dies do not suck![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1955/5 Cent?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...