Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 1766936, member: 15309&quot;]No reason to apologize, you thought it was an error so you posted in the correct section. I should add that the 1954-S is notoriously the worst struck date/mm in the entire Jefferson Nickels series. The incomplete details of Monticello are related the typically poor strike for this year and is not related to the &quot;halo effect&quot;.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I have posted below two photos of 1954-S Jefferson Nickels. The first has a typical strike and the second is my registry set example which has an outstanding strike for the date/mm.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Jefferson%20Nickels%204%20Sale/JN1954-SGEMBU_zpsa306f493.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Jefferson%20Nickels/JeffersonNickel1954-SNGCMS67wLabel.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Most 1954-S Jefferson Nickels have no step detail at all.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Paul[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in