Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;non_cents, post: 1804466, member: 30970&quot;]I am well aware of that coin, but many people know that this is a very&nbsp; controversial coin. Many believe it to be die damage and not an RPD. Considering that the mint stopped punching the last two digits after 1909, I must agree with the die damage assessment.</p><p><br /></p><p>from lincolncentresource.com...</p><p><br /></p><p>Sources:</p><p><a href="http://www.error-ref.com/1956-D_Lincoln_cent_with_partial_5_digit.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.error-ref.com/1956-D_Lincoln_cent_with_partial_5_digit.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.error-ref.com/1956-D_Lincoln_cent_with_partial_5_digit.html</a></p><p><a href="http://lincolncentresource.com/Controversial/Cents.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://lincolncentresource.com/Controversial/Cents.html" rel="nofollow">http://lincolncentresource.com/Controversial/Cents.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Charles Daughtrey and Bob Piazza (the owners of coppercoins.com and Lincoln Cent variety experts) also believe it to not be a repunched date.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in