Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="LaCointessa, post: 3435450, member: 87186"]Hiya [USER=73995]@Pickin and Grinin[/USER]  - I had a chance to look at SKH-1c-1952-02C and 02D. Thanks so much for not giving up on me. This is what I learned: In 02C the feature I am seeing on the right and left of the "T" is identified as a die crack and in 02D where the feature is more developed (at least to the right of the "T") it is identified as a retained cud. Nowhere is it referred to as a lamination issue, retained, "smooshed down" or otherwise. Comparing the OP's coin with the photographs of 02C and 02D, it appears the die crack in the OP's coin is somewhere in between. Unless what I am seeing on top of the T in 02D is only PMD, then I think I see more cud material (die crack has grown) in the 02D photographs than the OP's coin and the OP's coin has more cud material (die crack is larger) than 02C. I wonder if [USER=44615]@paddyman98[/USER] is convinced one way or the other now about what we are seeing on this coin. I hope I finally got this right.[/QUOTE]