Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1952 D
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Clawcoins, post: 3634513, member: 77814"]You will want to check websites like</p><p><a href="http://www.varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/RPMs%201952D.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/RPMs%201952D.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.varietyvista.com/02a LC RPMs Vol 1/RPMs 1952D.htm</a></p><p><br /></p><p>for RPMs - Repunched Mint Marks which is what a D over D would be.</p><p><br /></p><p>you MM has to be *exact*, as in *exact* comparison to the known RPMs. It's not a "it's kinda similar" or "looks similar" .. for coins it has to be *exact* as the indicators are very minute and overlooked by the inexperienced. You have to be extremely critical in your comparison and remove all biases (everyone wants their coins to have some "error" so most people are bias and some blindingly so).</p><p><br /></p><p>And remember, just because you have a 1952 D does not mean you have an RPM 1952 D D/D. there were millions made from a couple thousand working dies. And a singular D/D were from *one* particular working die.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you look at your 1952 D</p><p>[ATTACH=full]975085[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>and the one yours is even close to is 014 and 018. But we would need a better image of the date/mint mark for further evaluation. The harsh, undiffused, lighting from the left doesn't help either (neither do my sleepy eyes).</p><p><br /></p><p>probably more like 018, which looks like this:</p><p><img src="http://www.varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/1952-D%20Photos/1952DRPM018bg.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>But, remember the mm will be a certain location to the date. MMs back then here individually applied at the specific mint. Thus vary in location .. so that helps as another indicator.</p><p><img src="http://www.varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/1952-D%20Photos/1952DRPM018b%20date.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>But you "D" does not look like the above, even though it is "close" but close is only good in horseshoes, not coin collecting.</p><p>and the location does not match.</p><p>it does look like a sloppily applied MM though</p><p>and a die chip on the 2[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Clawcoins, post: 3634513, member: 77814"]You will want to check websites like [URL]http://www.varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/RPMs%201952D.htm[/URL] for RPMs - Repunched Mint Marks which is what a D over D would be. you MM has to be *exact*, as in *exact* comparison to the known RPMs. It's not a "it's kinda similar" or "looks similar" .. for coins it has to be *exact* as the indicators are very minute and overlooked by the inexperienced. You have to be extremely critical in your comparison and remove all biases (everyone wants their coins to have some "error" so most people are bias and some blindingly so). And remember, just because you have a 1952 D does not mean you have an RPM 1952 D D/D. there were millions made from a couple thousand working dies. And a singular D/D were from *one* particular working die. If you look at your 1952 D [ATTACH=full]975085[/ATTACH] and the one yours is even close to is 014 and 018. But we would need a better image of the date/mint mark for further evaluation. The harsh, undiffused, lighting from the left doesn't help either (neither do my sleepy eyes). probably more like 018, which looks like this: [IMG]http://www.varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/1952-D%20Photos/1952DRPM018bg.jpg[/IMG] But, remember the mm will be a certain location to the date. MMs back then here individually applied at the specific mint. Thus vary in location .. so that helps as another indicator. [IMG]http://www.varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/1952-D%20Photos/1952DRPM018b%20date.jpg[/IMG] But you "D" does not look like the above, even though it is "close" but close is only good in horseshoes, not coin collecting. and the location does not match. it does look like a sloppily applied MM though and a die chip on the 2[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1952 D
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...