Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 958643, member: 15199&quot;]It doesn&#039;t appear like either of the OMM ( D/S).</p><p><a href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1951omms.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1951omms.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1951omms.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>But it does have similarity to&nbsp; 1951D-1MM-032 D/D. You have the coin , so go to </p><p><a href="http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1951&amp;die_id=1951d1mm032&amp;die_state=mds" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1951&amp;die_id=1951d1mm032&amp;die_state=mds" rel="nofollow">http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1951&amp;die_id=1951d1mm032&amp;die_state=mds</a></p><p><br /></p><p>and check the other markers. If there are none, it could still be it , but Early Die State before the markers appeared. Or deterioration of the die in the lower part of the D due to wear/overuse. I would go with the latter myself.</p><p><br /></p><p>Jim[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in