Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
1950e $50
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 652040, member: 11668"]It's because of the new dry-intaglio printing process used for the 32-subject sheets. The 18-subject sheets had used wet-intaglio, in which the sheets had been dampened before the printing process, so that they wouldn't tear under the pressure of the printing plates; the new 32-subject presses were designed so as not to require that step.</p><p><br /></p><p>The old wet-printed notes had shrunk slightly after printing as they dried, so the new dry-printed notes had to be printed ever-so-slightly smaller in order to get a finished product of the same size. But there's no good way to "zoom out" a steel engraving by a few percent, so instead the BEP had to trim out small bits of the vignettes, portraits, borders, &c. to achieve the size reduction.</p><p><br /></p><p>It's particularly noticeable there at the bottom of the $50, because the whole amount of the vertical shrinkage had to be taken out right there--there's no room to cut anything out at the top, as the tip of the Capitol dome had already been right up against the lettering, even on the older plates. But similar cuts were made on all of the other denominations too, both face and back. Compare a 1935 $1 to a 1957 $1, and you'll notice that a bit less of Washington's collar is visible on the latter, for example, and that THE and AMERICA are closer to the side borders than they used to be. It can make a good puzzle to get an 18-subject note and a 32-subject note of the same denomination and type, and see just how many subtle differences you can spot....</p><p><br /></p><p>Basically, it's all a lot like the "wide" and "narrow" varieties of the 1934/35 notes, except that those are better known because some of them changed in the middle of a series, creating collectible varieties.</p><p><br /></p><p>Oh, and something similar happened with the web-press $1's, as well--I'm not sure precisely why, but the $1 note design had to be rebuilt for those plates too, and again there are lots of subtle differences in spacing of various elements on a web $1 vs. a regular $1 FRN.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 652040, member: 11668"]It's because of the new dry-intaglio printing process used for the 32-subject sheets. The 18-subject sheets had used wet-intaglio, in which the sheets had been dampened before the printing process, so that they wouldn't tear under the pressure of the printing plates; the new 32-subject presses were designed so as not to require that step. The old wet-printed notes had shrunk slightly after printing as they dried, so the new dry-printed notes had to be printed ever-so-slightly smaller in order to get a finished product of the same size. But there's no good way to "zoom out" a steel engraving by a few percent, so instead the BEP had to trim out small bits of the vignettes, portraits, borders, &c. to achieve the size reduction. It's particularly noticeable there at the bottom of the $50, because the whole amount of the vertical shrinkage had to be taken out right there--there's no room to cut anything out at the top, as the tip of the Capitol dome had already been right up against the lettering, even on the older plates. But similar cuts were made on all of the other denominations too, both face and back. Compare a 1935 $1 to a 1957 $1, and you'll notice that a bit less of Washington's collar is visible on the latter, for example, and that THE and AMERICA are closer to the side borders than they used to be. It can make a good puzzle to get an 18-subject note and a 32-subject note of the same denomination and type, and see just how many subtle differences you can spot.... Basically, it's all a lot like the "wide" and "narrow" varieties of the 1934/35 notes, except that those are better known because some of them changed in the middle of a series, creating collectible varieties. Oh, and something similar happened with the web-press $1's, as well--I'm not sure precisely why, but the $1 note design had to be rebuilt for those plates too, and again there are lots of subtle differences in spacing of various elements on a web $1 vs. a regular $1 FRN.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
1950e $50
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...