Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;hammerhead, post: 116519, member: 5032&quot;]<a href="http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/2342/sdime0065ao.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/2342/sdime0065ao.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/2342/sdime0065ao.jpg</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; Yes your probably right?? The mintmark is on the back of this coin. It is an s. I&#039;m not trying to make this an s by saying it is under the 1 in the date! This is a 1949s with the s being on the reverse of the coin where it belongs. I only photo the front of the coin because thats where The question was pointing to. I&#039;m not wondering if I can make this an s if I illusion it to be under the 1 in the date. it is an s according to the reverse. Phew!!&nbsp; Just wondering if it could be a result of the designers initials? with an s being so close to the s under the 1 in the date I find it hard to believe it&#039;s an illusion. Is the extension of the 6, cleanly broke, an illusion also? Thanks,&nbsp; Delusional:rolling:&nbsp; David[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in