Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 2110110, member: 4920&quot;]Paddy, I&#039;m probably a little late with this, but I didn&#039;t want to leave you without a reply. Angie&#039;s (Jello&#039;s) photos show well what I&#039;m referring to on the foreshortening aspect in relationship to the overlaying image. Look at his overlaying or &quot;top&quot; images and note the thicknesses of those characters, then look at your &quot;top&quot; image and note how &quot;thin&quot; or &quot;foreshortened,&quot; comparatively-speaking, that is. That&#039;s because the strike took a &quot;hop&quot; and smeared half that character off, the half you&#039;re seeing as the secondary image. You see that in strike doubling, too. When you see the &quot;top&quot; character is smeared out of shape like that to form the bottom character, 99.99% of the time it&#039;s due to the striking. In fact, sometimes I think the percentage may even be higher than that, lol.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in