Looks like a normal nickel. The war nickel planchets, especially one that circulated have a variety of patinas. A smaller normal photo will work better. But it's about 100% that this is just a nickel.
The densities are quite different, Copper is 8.96 and silver is 10.5. Silver is almost 15% higher. The last two pictures look like a regular copper nickel alloy five cent piece. If you really want to tell, find someone with an XRF gun and have them shoot it. If it is a war nickel planchet the results will make it clear.
I wish I had a silver war nic for every foreign coin I have pulled out of junk boxes thinking them to be silver but turned out to be cu/ni.
Most circulated war nickels have a very distinctive toning/patina due to the composition, and this differs from standard composition nickels. Your coin has all of the visual characteristics of a standard circulated nickel. It has none of the visual characteristics of a normally circulated war nickel. I’m curious as to why you believe you may have beaten Lotto-type odds and found a transitional planchet error, particular when it has the visual characteristics of a standard 75Cu25Ni planchet? Are we missing something in your pics? As others have said, a handheld XRF run by an experienced operator should be able to easily determine if it's a standard 75Cu25Ni composition
There were some left over war nickel planchets that got minted accidentally in 1946. This is not one of them.
I read that it is not a war nickle. The error is silver was left in the mold and several 1946 nickles got through and thats what makes them rare.
...close, but they don't use a mold for US coins, they are struck from planchets that are punched out of stock. The bins holding the planchets from 1945 might have had some silver blanks that got struck as 1946's. Welcome to CT
What is it about this nickel that makes you think it may be silver instead of the usual copper nickel composition?
I know this is an old thread that someone revived, but I'm guessing OP didn't get the results from NGC that he wanted.
Geez, I just got called in to edit some reported content, only to find later that the flagged content I edited was part of a nearly six year old thread.
Indeed, though I’ll again wish in vain that all newbie visitors to the site would learn how to post their own new threads rather than dig up ancient ones to post in. (I know- it’s not like that that will ever happen…) I often overlook the timestamps. I guess they do the same, when they click in from a Google search or whatever.
Is there any way to LOCK the Error Coins forum to members who have less than 6 months tenure or 2,000 page views in that forum section? Just sayin' . . . . . . Yeah, I know, revenue from page views will plummet. Maybe we could design an error "Quiz" that new members must pass to be given posting rights in Error Coins . . . . . . . @paddyman98 ? Z