Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 26814854, member: 73489&quot;]Actually, it was probably 99.9% vs. 0.1%.&nbsp; Maybe even 99.99% vs. 0.01%.</p><p><br /></p><p>Assuming 75 million adults, that would mean either 750,000 people buying coins (doubtful) or 75,000.</p><p><br /></p><p>Heck, it could have been 0.001% or 7,500 folks or even 750 repeat offenders/addicts at 0.0001% <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>The point being that it was a very narrow group that Woodin wanted to protect and Treasury said wasn&#039;t worth going after, whatever the number.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie33" alt=":cigar:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>And Treasury noted in Section 20 that there was a 4-coin year/mint limit on the $2.50 Quarter Eagles, the coin that most of the &quot;masses&quot; would probably gravitate for affordability reasons if they were looking to buy/hoard.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in