Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 20259261, member: 4920&quot;]Pam, there&#039;s a D/S OMM that&#039;s a real old and well-recognized one. This isn&#039;t it. At least, not based off these fuzzy photos, it isn&#039;t.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is what you&#039;re dealing with in terms of the one anybody cares about:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1540389[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Note how indiscreet this is. That should be the first thing that jumps out at you. The second thing should be you need photos this crisp and clear to tell.</p><p><br /></p><p>There&#039;s money in this one if you can luck onto it. From all we can tell from your photos, yours is a crusty, circulated 1944-D. We need photos of this quality, in other words, as this OMM is that subtle. Even the less-impressive D/D RPMs need this quality, or they can&#039;t be diagnosed. You post up a fuzzball, you get fuzzball answers. And that&#039;s, I&#039;m sorry to break it to you, just the way it is.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in