1943 P war nickel

First, no upside down D under the D in GOD. Next, no 2 between the 3 and 4. How would that have occurred? Third, no dropped filling under the date. No ponytail strike through. There's nothing on the back of the head so why is that interesting?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Your former boss said that they haven't received a single death threat since you left.
~ Chris

 

Lol

 

Thanks, you really trying to get me to relive this?
Since it has to do with Avery I didn't read the thread.
He gave enough information in this response alone.

 

I have nothing against you, but you're the one who chooses to defend him. ~ Chris

 

I only defend those that are willing to learn?
My toes are sensitive, don't hold them against the fire forever.

 

@Avery G. do you ever take wear, damage etc... etc.... into your thoughts.
You like to throw all the rookie mistakes at us, Seems you have a trust issue before you have a learning curve. When are you gonna retain the info you that has been repeatedly posted. Do you utilize the reference'sand use them to your bennefit?

If you like others and I Pickin then keep ahead, just remember there are more like you everyday that we try to help also.

 

Avery I was doing similar things you are doing back over 40 years ago. Back then it was hard to learn because of no internet. I thought every imperfection on coins was a error. when I learned

 

what was a real mint error and what was only damage from circulation I had thousands of coins to throw away. What the folks are telling you on here is the truth. It will take you years and years to learn it all about errors. Best way is to first study how the mint makes the coins and go from there. sometimes damage from the coins being used can look like a error. the coin metal is really soft and it can easily be damaged from use or striking into other coins.

 

Avery , if your going to be an internet troll you have to learn to finesse your game. You're going way too far
in your claims and denials. The things you post have
to make some sort of sense . Please start taking your
meds as prescribed. And stop sneaking out of the day
room. You're going to get the staff in trouble.

 

Avery don't give up on your coin being what you think it is. It could easily be the scarce 43 over 42 date. the 2 under the 3 is really hard to see and I would imagine even harder to photograph. Don't pay any attention to what others on here say. I think they will say about anything . Them saying you and me are the same person shows that they don't care what they say. If you want to confirm your coin get on google and put in 1943 over 42 nickle in the search engine and they have some good photos of one there to compare your coin to. If yours really is the scarce over date it will not look as good as the uncirculated coin in the photos because your coin has some wear .Good luck and let us know what you think of your coin after looking at the photos.

 

Plenty of photos of the overdate on this site: https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf...91#imgrc=sGQth7yqpQaFTM&imgdii=snZF_jmVcmm9dM
The OP's nickel is not the 43 over 42 and he's not claiming it is. If you read his post, he claims the 2 is between the 4 and 3.

 

From his description I go clued in to what it may be from him saying it looked like a 2 between the 4 and 3.. Sometimes the descriptions from other members can contain clues . let's not totally shoot the op's coin down and let him check it out by him self . I can tell from the better photos on the internet that the 2 in the date is not very visible .It is only visible on the close ups of it . The date on the op's coin is dirty looking but I do believe if it is the overdate one it could be seen in hand.Maybe this is what the op is seeing. People needs to stop downing others coins from photos and just say they are not sure unless it is a easy to see variety. Wouldn't you feel bad to cause someone to throw a valuable coin away, I sure would.

 

Probably the same way they escorted that guy from the movie Casino out when they caught him cheating.

 

The OP's coin is not even close to the 3/2. The 3/2 would easily be identified with the photos given. Even some much worse.
Your statements are ridiculous.

 

Please click "like" on this comment if you agree, in all seriousness, that @Avery G. and @rascal are the SAME PERSON. (You mean SOME of you still aren't convinced???)

There is no way these two names are different people. It is not a coincidence that they are both incredibly dense and delusional about their coins and in how they dismiss and criticize true experts.

 

Looks like someone thinks they may have stuck their toes in the fire from the hysterical way they are acting. Once again I am not Avery G and have never heard of that Name until a few days ago. I see no reason for others to call me or the Avery person dense and delusional . Name calling just shows their true colors as to how they really are and is never no benefit to anyone.IMO

 

I was looking around today and come up with a really good older post here on CT . It is titled " identifying 43/2 P nickel " It is a interesting post and has some good photos. I went back and looked at Avery's photos and the 4 and 3 in the date shows extra thickness and on the back part of the 3 I seen what looks like it may be a tiny part of the 2 in the center curve of the 3 . Regardless of what others have said I have never said Avery's coin was a real 43/2 I just said give him a chance to look at it better or get someone else to look at it before downing him and his coin.

 

Um, how about...

1. No.
2. You are dead wrong.
3. Experts can already tell.
4. You (and your psychotic dual personality Avery) were already told it isn't.
5. What the screaming hell does "give it a chance" mean? No serious numismatist would ever say that.
6. Start a new hobby. I suggest Arctic scuba diving.