Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 1724317, member: 15199&quot;]I agree with Jloring above that it is within normal range of movement for the wear That extended tail of the &quot;3&quot; is a very thin portion of metal, and adherence of the zinc cladding to the steel core wasn&#039;t always good, allowing wear and counting machines to &#039;push&#039; the tail around a little.</p><p><br /></p><p>I do remember reading that there were 2 different manufacturers of planchets during the year and a slightly different weight, but their tolerances overlapped so no one could identify coins today as being a &#039;type I&#039; or a type &#039;II&#039;.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in