Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Oldhoopster, post: 3167436, member: 84179&quot;]If you go back and read your November post 3 or 4 threads ago, you commented that Mike Diamond said that the coin sounded like it was Cu-Ni.&nbsp; While this is encouraging, his suggestion that you get an XRF done means that it has potential, not that he agrees with your assessment.&nbsp; And all [USER=92083]@JCro57[/USER] was saying that 9+ months and 3 threads later, you still haven’t done the 1 thing Mike Diamond suggested. The longer you keep screwing around, the more you sound like the kid in JCro57’s post.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think the fact that a number of members suggested how to get it tested and/or submitted in the last 9+ months indicates that there may be a possibility that you might have something.&nbsp; But finding a coin like this would be extremely unusual. And extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.&nbsp; How do we know you are actually sending it this time or if you’ll come back in 2 months with another piece of inaccurate data from an unsubstantiated source?&nbsp; Heck, I’m beginning to wonder if you really did send it to Mike Diamond.&nbsp; If I had something like this and he suggested how to confirm it, I would have been on top of it the next day, not 9 months later.</p><p><br /></p><p>In the beginning, I think many of us were rooting for you to have one.&nbsp; But Now???[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in