Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;AgCollector, post: 288914, member: 5928&quot;][FONT=arial, helvetica]<font size="2">Here&#039;s an additional bit of info, from the PCGS coin lingo site:</font></p><p><font size="2"><br /></font></p><p><font size="2"><a href="http://www.pcgs.com/lingo.chtml?Letter=R" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/lingo.chtml?Letter=R" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/lingo.chtml?Letter=R</a></font></p><p><font size="2"><br /></font></p><p><font size="2"><br /></font></p><p><font size="2"><br /></font></p><p><font size="2">It occurs to me that perhaps the problem is in the use of the term &quot;overdate&quot;.&nbsp; It seems well accepted that the 1942/1 Mercury dime is a class three doubled die (see above links to CONECA and PCGS).&nbsp; </font></p><p><font size="2"><br /></font></p><p><font size="2">But, is the 1942/1 Mercury dime an overdate?&nbsp; I don&#039;t know, and I&#039;m sorry if my calling it that earlier caused this confusion.&nbsp; </font></p><p><font size="2"><br /></font></p><p><font size="2">Is it the purposeful creation of the die that determines whether it&#039;s an overdate?&nbsp; So that if it&#039;s not on purpose it&#039;s not an overdate?</font></p><p><font size="2"></font>[/FONT][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in