Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Briboy07, post: 1948570, member: 70431"]Hey Sir, sorry to go back to this one. As I look at some of the early listings of this series the few of them, the 9 seems to be the one that is dbld. Just wondering if you can really take another look at that 9 again. The 1 seems to show a split but pretty much on top of each other. The 4 seems flat but when you get to the 2 (what's left of it) the top portion is very thick.  Back to the 9 though it does show a minor (what I think I see) split serif on the bottom and the doubling (that I think I see) is around the top East of the 9; this is not flat at all and resembles some of the earlier ones in the series. Couldn't there be doubling and MD on coin/two different process. Please, I am not trying to be a stinker just asking if you can revisit it. I can try to get more of close up on the 9,  but I don't I have great equipment. Thank you for looking and responding the first times you are the only one responding ty!!!![/QUOTE]