Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 1151000, member: 27832&quot;]Compare these with the closeup <a href="http://www.PcgsCoinFacts.com/UserImages/1942%20over%201%20Dime%20closeup%20550x278.png" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.PcgsCoinFacts.com/UserImages/1942%20over%201%20Dime%20closeup%20550x278.png" rel="nofollow">here</a>, from the PCGS CoinFacts page <a href="http://www.pcgscoinfacts.com/CoinDetail.aspx?s=5036" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgscoinfacts.com/CoinDetail.aspx?s=5036" rel="nofollow">here</a>. (I won&#039;t embed the images due to CoinTalk copyright policy.) Look at the prominent doubling on the 4 in the real example; yours shows none. Look at how thin the stroke is at the top of the 1; on yours, the stroke is as thick as the rest of the digit.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not normally especially confident about spotting counterfeits, but this one&#039;s pretty unmistakeable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in