Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 3223098, member: 15309&quot;]Dude, you don’t get to change numismatic nomenclature.&nbsp; The term damage is reserved for problem coins.&nbsp; Wear is the natural result of circulation and not considered damage by anyone in the numismatic community other than you.</p><p><br /></p><p>When you type things like this, you cast yourself as a member of the lunatic fringe, like Ricko who calls all toning damage.</p><p><br /></p><p>Insider was politely trying to suggest that you use the correct term “circulation wear”.&nbsp; Rather than defend an indefensible position, you could have just said “thank you!”[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in