1941 WLH, MS-62??????

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by TypeCoin971793, Oct 16, 2018.

Page 7 of 7
  1. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    It is damage insofar that it degrades the coin, but it is not numismatic damage insofar that it resulted from normal use.
     
    TypeCoin971793, Nov 3, 2018
    #121 + Quote Reply
    Insider and Pickin and Grinin like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. IBetASilverDollar

    IBetASilverDollar Well-Known Member

    Sure I mean no one calls wear damage it has a different meaning in numismatic world. If someone describes a coin as damaged because it has wear they are doing it wrong technicalities aside.
     
    IBetASilverDollar, Nov 3, 2018
    #122 + Quote Reply
    Insider likes this.
  4. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Hence the second half of my sentence
     
    TypeCoin971793, Nov 3, 2018
    #123 + Quote Reply
  5. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Um, not nobody, we got a guy right here!
     
    Lehigh96, Nov 3, 2018
    #124 + Quote Reply
  6. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Well then, aren't coins nothing but damaged planchets?

    DuckandCover.gif
     
    jtlee321, Nov 3, 2018
    #125 + Quote Reply
    TypeCoin971793 and IBetASilverDollar like this.
  7. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I finally got the chance to look at this coin under a good light, and I see hairlines (NOT from cleaning, but from rub between coins) in the fields which I originally mistook for die polish. MS-62 is consistent with NGC’s standards.
     
    TypeCoin971793, Nov 7, 2018
    #126 + Quote Reply
Page 7 of 7
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page