Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Paddy54, post: 2644214, member: 19250&quot;]Both coin A &amp; B are MS 65 ,both coin A &amp; B are 39 rev /40. Coin # 2 FS.</p><p>One graded by Anacs&nbsp; the other PCGS. The reason for this post? Even though&nbsp; I&nbsp; believe&nbsp; that&nbsp; each by today&#039;s standards&nbsp; are under graded , not by more than 1 pt. </p><p>Both coins do have a few nicks but compared&nbsp; to others they are pretty free from hits that would drop their grades.</p><p>Compare&nbsp; to Heavycam.monstervam 1947 posted the ms 67 specimen . </p><p>I understand&nbsp; that&nbsp; the&nbsp; images aren&#039;t&nbsp; the&nbsp; best.... but&nbsp; what I have seen pcgs&nbsp; graded I have to question&nbsp; under a standard&nbsp; 20 years ago to present&nbsp; date. Being honest&nbsp; coin #1 to my eye is a 65 toned now maybe a + for eye appeal .&nbsp; Coin #2 is what I say is a 66 in hand, and is FS.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in