Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;V. Kurt Bellman, post: 2961075, member: 71723&quot;]Yes, this is EXACTLY true. Here&#039;s why, for those who don&#039;t know (Lehigh probably DOES):</p><p><br /></p><p>The changeover from the Reverse of 1938 to the Reverse of 1940 happened fairly early in the production year at Philly, hence the ratio is tilted in favor of Reverse of 1940.</p><p><br /></p><p>The changeover happened somewhat later at Denver, and the ratio is about 50/50 by most experts&#039; reckoning.</p><p><br /></p><p>The changeover at San Francisco only happened quite LATE in the production flow, so the Reverse of 1938 greatly outnumbers the Reverse of 1940.</p><p><br /></p><p>The weirdest part is that there are Philly proofs of both reverses, the 1940 Reverse being the tough one. Almost the entire proof mintage was done early, with a much smaller run obviously done later in the year.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in