Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;spy88, post: 10864, member: 968&quot;]It&#039;s almost as if everyone that had contact with it had caught something to miss the DDR!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I think there is a hit to the reverse under the S in PLURIBUS and some small nicks to Monti.&nbsp; I do believe either PCGS or NGC would give it a 65.&nbsp; As for the steps, I tried real hard (and still am) to not see FS here.&nbsp; There does seem to be slight bridging @ P3, S4/5 but hard to tell from pic.&nbsp; ICG missed the DDR---maybe they missed the FS!&nbsp; I can only hope!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>From my search of Heritage archives dating back to &#039;95, there have been 18 65 or 66 DDRs sold.&nbsp; 10 were in 65 and 8 were in 66, 9 are NGC and 9 are PCGS.&nbsp; Lowest hammer for a 65 was $385 (NGC) and highest was $834 (NGC).&nbsp; In 66, the lowest was $528 (NGC) and highest was $1610 (PCGS) but back in 8/01.&nbsp; Latest auction for a 65 was $690 (NGC) and for a 66 was $1265 (PCGS).&nbsp; If it makes FS---well, I&#039;ll wait for the coin in-hand before I start celebrating. </p><p><br /></p><p>Based on these results and the probability of losing a point, I would think PCGS the better submission---also the fact they are somewhat looser with the FS desig.&nbsp; I also think that your estimate of $550 is pretty close but may be a tad on the low side if PCGS slabbed.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks Jason![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in