Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Kevin Mader, post: 5396373, member: 106826&quot;]Yes, I stand with my first assessment.&nbsp; Not a dot cent.</p><p><br /></p><p>Keith - Most of us got more out of the full obverse photo than those super magnified photos.&nbsp; Once a photo pixelates like that...useless to me for the most part.&nbsp; Keep in mind that sometimes &#039;less-is-more&#039;.&nbsp; Use the Goldilocks approach...go for just right.&nbsp; For the record, first timers traditionally over magnify everything (me included) but learn to back off eventually and find that sweet spot with your phone&#039;s camera or other apparatus. </p><p><br /></p><p>For the record, it would have been very cool if you struck gold here!!&nbsp; It doesn&#039;t happen often, but sometimes we are amazed at a find.&nbsp; In the past 10 years, I&#039;ve seen folks finding high grade 1969 S DDO and another found a 1955 DDO.&nbsp; Yet another found one of the harder to find 1972 DDOs...so it can happen.&nbsp; The community here will go at length to help ensure that you aren&#039;t overlooking anything, and most are wishful for another&#039;s success.&nbsp; So hopefully you understand that while we might not have the opinion you hope to hear, we are advocating for you.&nbsp; And of course, you can pursue other channels if you need absolute clarity on what you have.&nbsp; And we&#039;d be happy to be wrong.&nbsp; Good luck![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in