Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 169915, member: 112&quot;]And that&#039;s exactly what I was having a problem with. For if the dies were not misaligned, you&#039;d never see the die clash marks because they would line up perfectly with the incuse design on the other die.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, in order to see clash marks, raised ones anyway, die #1 has to become misaligned and be clashed again. Or, die #1 has to be replaced, misaligned and then clashed by the original clashed die #2.</p><p><br /></p><p>Okay, I&#039;ve learned something and I understand how raised clash marks occur. But now I have another question for you Frank. Why is that the only clash marks I have ever seen are raised ? I honestly can&#039;t think of a single example of an incuse clash mark that I have seen, other than the ones you just showed. And based on this dicussion, you&#039;d think they would be far and away more common than the raised type for 3 to 5 things have to happen for the raised type to occur while only thing has to happen for the incuse to ocurr.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in