Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Small Size, post: 2594929, member: 77924&quot;]Hmm. I&#039;ll accept that the BEP was never in violation of the law. But I find it difficult to think public pressure would make a difference in the case of 1935G $1 notes. That assumes a level of general public awareness of the details of their currency that is unsupported by facts I know. When you consider that no other denomination note was issued with the motto prior to 1964, it seems even less credible that public pressure was an issue.</p><p>Unless I am made aware of information I do not currently know, I&#039;m going to continue to assert the 1935G $1 notes with motto exist only because the BEP needed new 18 subject $1 back plates, and it was illegal to make them without the motto, but they didn&#039;t want it to be a big deal, so they printed some 1935G with motto notes in 1962, and hoped nobody would notice.</p><p><br /></p><p>Edit: You&#039;re right about those 1950E notes. Although the 1950E $100&#039;s were the only notes of that series not printed concurrently with Series 1963 notes. There was a time in 1965-66 when the only current $100&#039;s were Series 1950E.</p><p>Those were the days.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in