1935 d ??????? Retained cud?

This one confuses me looks like a retained cud on top of head and he missing gash on cheek but on reverse looks like the cheek that's missing

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

That is really neat!

 

I think it's a coincidence. If you're more apt to delve into it further, use a micrometer to measure the missing cheek piece and the cud on the reverse.

 

I don't think it's a cud at all no clue what it is

 

It looks like a Lamination issue. Not a cud.

Can you post separate pictures instaed of a collage.
It's hard to view when they all enlarge at the same time.

 

I think they are all lamination issues.

 

I think it is just a coincidence that the fragment on the reverse happens to be the same shape as the anomaly on Lincoln's face.

Chris

 

Concur with the others when saying it is a lamination and not a CUD/die break.

 

Ditto to what @furryfrog02 said.

 

Ditto twice

 

Looks to me to be a lamination with dirt or corrosion under it.

 

Hi John.. Welcome to CoinTalk. Will you be doing a thread in the Introductions forum on this coin forum?

 

i didnt think lams was raised off coin this is raised

 

This is not a CUD issue but it looks like a lamination issue to me.

 

There must be 2 of those. Now find the other