Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;alurid, post: 6900827, member: 81991&quot;]I think the dated version is the second issue, as they seem to be struck with the same dies, or at least the same hub. Note the short stem of the &quot;Y&quot; in lucky, But I do not have any proof of this. I also had not considered a debris filled die due to the fact that the field on my undated one show die wear striations and is evenly smooth in appearance, But yet I can not rule that possibility out. Your question had me take a much closer look. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1272973[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1272974[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>My undated one has a reverse rotation of +90°, While the dated one is rotated ~15°.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces83811.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces83811.html" rel="nofollow">https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces83811.html</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in