1934 $1 SC with 1928 overprint

Discussion in 'Paper Money' started by funkee, Aug 18, 2012.

  1. funkee

    funkee Tender, Legal

    Considering all the multi-million dollar notes on eBay recently, this one actually merits a chin scratch. It's neat as heck. I didn't even know such a thing existed. But worth $1,000,000? I think not.

    Check it out for yourself:


    If it is a continuation of the 1928 series as the seller claims, there should be no break in serial numbers, right? Does anyone know the serials to the last known run of 1928-E notes?
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest

    to hide this ad.
  3. urbanchemist


    item has been removed. most have been a fake
  4. funkee

    funkee Tender, Legal

    Updated the link. Sorry.

    Here are the photos for good measure:

  5. tbudwiser

    tbudwiser Active Member

    Woah! I didn't know it was possible for such a note to exist...
  6. rickmp

    rickmp The other White Meat.

  7. tbudwiser

    tbudwiser Active Member

    Yeah I had to delete the first couple words off the link the OP provided to make it work.

    Thanks for the good link, Rick.
  8. funkee

    funkee Tender, Legal

    Crazyness, the forum's link app added that extra http://.
  9. Jamericon

    Jamericon Junior Member

    There is nothing "transitional" about this note. The definitive article appeared in Bank Note Reporter last year.

    The BEP concurrently printed 1928 and 1934 $1 silver certificates during 1934 and 1935. They did so on separate plate presses and numbering presses. Someone mistakenly placed a 1934 sheet onto a pile of 1928s for numbering with 1928 serials. This makes the note an error--spectacular nonetheless, but that simple.

    There is no technical or factual basis for the transitional label--it is merely promotional.
  10. MEC2

    MEC2 Enormous Member

    You need more likes on your posts Jamericon... good info.
  11. SteveInTampa

    SteveInTampa Innocent bystander

    I agree with MEC2, and will add that I enjoy Jamie's research and articles in Paper Money Magazine and Bank Note Reporter.
  12. tbudwiser

    tbudwiser Active Member

    You agree but you didn't click like yourself??

  13. funkee

    funkee Tender, Legal

    Thanks for info Jamericon. I guess the Friedberg number is not valid if it is an error note.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page