Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mikenoodle, post: 1230956, member: 307&quot;]They knew very well that they would either be allowed to keep all or none of the ones surrendered. The authentication argument is a red herring. They probably wanted to sell them all. </p><p><br /></p><p>The reason that I feel the Langbord family has more is that they have more than a few and there are IIRC 17 more that are unaccounted for. If these 10 were legal to own, they could then let the rest surface. If you think about your 2 or 3 as a test balloon theory, my explanation becomes plausible if you think of it as them surrendering less than half of what they have.</p><p><br /></p><p>Even now that they have lost these, they can still sell the rest on the black market.</p><p><br /></p><p>I don&#039;t believe that anyone would surrender them all if they were unsure about their disposition especially if it meant losing all of them[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in