Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;charley, post: 7657535, member: 5372&quot;]That is not correct at all. In fact, it is grossly incorrect. One does not have to be a philatelic expert to determine the incorrectness of your opinion. When an item sells for 4.9 mil and it is 2 mil above the last known sale, and breaks all records in doing so, that is not the definition of &quot;low end of the range/estimates&quot; (whatever that gobbldygobbledness means).</p><p><br /></p><p>I don&#039;t care one way or the other, but try to at least present some semblance of reasonable opinion, when that is all you are saying.</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, no, it was not Gross on that &quot;probably the top stamp collection&quot; thing. The Bechtel Family and the Farouk Family and the Royal Family and the Boy&#039;s Town Collections would have to be bypassed, and 4 others that I know of, before the &quot;probably&quot; becomes a possibility of a semblance of comparison. Or maybe your recent memory does not recall past memory. That is understandable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in