Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 7657183, member: 4920&quot;]I have a better one. The grading fees are too high. That makes about as much sense as what you just said. Your problem is you don&#039;t even see the issue. No wonder you keep getting this wrong. The issue isn&#039;t the future sales prices, as you erroneously think. I agree. The world agrees. These chums don&#039;t give two hoots about that. They don&#039;t care about the grade. The issue is what comes with the grade. Switch your thinking to that, the attribution.</p><p><br /></p><p>This half-assed way PCGS and CAC communicated this grade was for this auction to proceed. How is this a numismatic auction without a grade? I can hear it now. Please grade this for us, you fools, so we can auction this sorry-looking, damaged thing!</p><p><br /></p><p>The more this nonsense continues, the more it&#039;s the genuine article, right? But by innuendo, it is. This is the second big auction reinforcing that innuendo. Where are the facts this is the one? Who cares about that? This one said this, and that one said that, and said, and said, and said, and said--get off our backs with facts! Are you beginning to get the idea? It&#039;s like my SVDB. I say it&#039;s genuine. Therefore, it&#039;s genuine. Let&#039;s get on with the show.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ll tell you. There are better attributions from Variety Vista and Wexler on single-squeeze DDOs you can&#039;t see without a microscope than there is here. Every week we&#039;re coming to blows over whether some minuscule deformity is a genuine error, and yet they don&#039;t give a thought to whether this coin is what they say it is? Why is that? They lack the experts to track it down? Or they don&#039;t care to know? Which do you think?</p><p><br /></p><p>Here, PCGS, CAC, grade my 1914-D. It&#039;s a 1914-D. And when you finish with that, grade my 1922 &quot;No D.&quot; And then my 1916-D Merc. You can trust me. A little old lady gave them to me after I helped her across the street. That&#039;s how authentic this 1933 Farouk is. Get it together...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in