1932 P Quarter, rainbow toning on Obverse. Thoughts on grade?

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by Gregg702, Dec 15, 2018.

  1. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    Hello everyone. I just wanted to see if anyone had any thoughts on the grade of this 1932 P quarter. It came in a set with much lower grade D and S coins, but I am curious if this may be worth sending in to grade. It has good eye appeal, IMO.

    IMG_1683.JPG IMG_1684.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    Here is a better picture of the reverse.

    IMG_5833.JPG
     
  4. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    High MS would be worth grading.
    I am on the fence AU/low MS.
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2018
    Gregg702 likes this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Looks to be a low grade MS to me. Still, not worth the cost of grading. Put it in an airtight and call it a day.
     
    Gregg702 likes this.
  6. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    Thanks guys. I was on the fence about it being MS63 or 64.
     
  7. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    The toning on that coin is very questionable IMO, I think it would details grade for questionable color.
     
    JCro57 likes this.
  8. Mojavedave

    Mojavedave Senior Member

    Nice 32-P. Almost looks like a spitting eagle.
     
  9. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    I just wish the D & S looked so good.
     
  10. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    The more I look at it the more I think it is MS.
    The mark on the neck bothers me, and I don't like the mushy IGWT.
    If it's not QC, I would be 62/63. It's a weak strike as evidenced by the
    poor eagle feather details. Even though the rev. is nice.
    Washington's are tough to grade.
     
  11. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    I agree on the tough to grade aspect. You can see a light strike in the ribbon in his hair as well. It does look better in person that it does in pictures. Very nice luster.
     
  12. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    It's uno, but the color would mark it QT.
     
  13. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    QT?
     
  14. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    Questionable Toning.
     
  15. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    Ah. It came in a complete book set, in a Whitman Classic book. It is the only toned coin in the set.
     
  16. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    If it had been in an album for 50 years,
    is it correct that the reverse shows little toning and the exposed side shows a lot? And now that I read the above (simul postings) the other old coins should show the same toning. If they don't, that seems suspicious.
     
    JCro57 likes this.
  17. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    That is why they say 'questionable'. It's the TPGs way of CYA, and not taking a stand one way or the other. I would say it's NT, but I don't slab them.
     
  18. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    Hard to say, but it does not look like artificial toning in person as much as it does on the computer screen.
     
  19. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    It's a nice coin. IDT it needs grading.
    But if you roll the dice and it comes up high like MS 65 the value goes way up. This is really on the fence. You never know what they are going to say, although they seem to have tightened the reins a little. I don't think it's higher than 63.
     
    Gregg702 likes this.
  20. Gregg702

    Gregg702 Active Member

    At 64 it sheet's at $75, anything under that is a waste of money sending it to NGC. I may just send it with other coins when I get enough to send more in, just for giggles.
     
    Michael K and Randy Abercrombie like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page