Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1932-D Washinton 25c. GRADE & PRICE? Please Help!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="CamaroDMD, post: 1149865, member: 5233"]Here is the problem, you are taking data that is almost 80 years old and assuming it's still accurate. It's not. How long have you been collecting coins? You seem inexperienced and that's OK, this is a good place to learn about things like this. Here is an example that is well known that I think will make it clearer how a coin with a larger mintage can be rarer:</p><p><br /></p><p>Lets talk about Lincoln cents for a minute. It's well established that there are 2 true key coins in the Lincoln series: those are the 1909-S VDB with a mintage of 484,000 and the 1914-D with a mintage of 1,193,000. These coins are roughly 100 years old and when they were minted there was 3x more 1914-Ds. So, one would expect that the 1909-S VDB would be rarer and more valuable...but during that 100 years things have changed.</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm going to throw out a couple values found in the 2007 Red Book. It's the newest edition I have. Red Book values aren't exact...but they do show relative trends and I don't have time to go to HA and get better values (I have to see a patient at school in an hour so I need to leave in a few minutes).</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, here are some values:</p><p><br /></p><p>1909-S VDB G4: $600</p><p>1914-D G4: $135</p><p><br /></p><p>1909-S VDB EF40: $1000</p><p>1914-D EF40: $600</p><p><br /></p><p>1909-S VDB MS60: $1350</p><p>1914-D MS60: $1600</p><p><br /></p><p>As you can see, the 1914-D overtakes the 1909-S VDB despite the 3x mintage by MS60. The differences even become more dramatic as you go higher in the grades. The reason is how many have survived. The 1909 was the first year and many were saved in high grade, so they are more common. The 1914 was not saved so as you go higher in grade, the value skyrockets. Original mintage doesn't mean a whole lot when those coins are 100 years old. The trend with the 1932 Washington's is even more dramatic despite a very similar mintage.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are some values for the 1932-D ans 1932-S Washington's from the same Red Book:</p><p><br /></p><p>1932-D VG8: $145</p><p>1932-S VG8: $140</p><p><br /></p><p>1932-D AU50: $500</p><p>1932-S AU50: $240</p><p><br /></p><p>1932-D MS65: $24000</p><p>1932-S MS65: $6750</p><p><br /></p><p>As you can see, as the grade increases the 1932-D is far more valuable. This is because the surviving numbers are much lower. Even though 28,800 more 1932-D quarters were minted, it is far rarer today. There is no way to argue that when you look at the numbers.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="CamaroDMD, post: 1149865, member: 5233"]Here is the problem, you are taking data that is almost 80 years old and assuming it's still accurate. It's not. How long have you been collecting coins? You seem inexperienced and that's OK, this is a good place to learn about things like this. Here is an example that is well known that I think will make it clearer how a coin with a larger mintage can be rarer: Lets talk about Lincoln cents for a minute. It's well established that there are 2 true key coins in the Lincoln series: those are the 1909-S VDB with a mintage of 484,000 and the 1914-D with a mintage of 1,193,000. These coins are roughly 100 years old and when they were minted there was 3x more 1914-Ds. So, one would expect that the 1909-S VDB would be rarer and more valuable...but during that 100 years things have changed. I'm going to throw out a couple values found in the 2007 Red Book. It's the newest edition I have. Red Book values aren't exact...but they do show relative trends and I don't have time to go to HA and get better values (I have to see a patient at school in an hour so I need to leave in a few minutes). Anyway, here are some values: 1909-S VDB G4: $600 1914-D G4: $135 1909-S VDB EF40: $1000 1914-D EF40: $600 1909-S VDB MS60: $1350 1914-D MS60: $1600 As you can see, the 1914-D overtakes the 1909-S VDB despite the 3x mintage by MS60. The differences even become more dramatic as you go higher in the grades. The reason is how many have survived. The 1909 was the first year and many were saved in high grade, so they are more common. The 1914 was not saved so as you go higher in grade, the value skyrockets. Original mintage doesn't mean a whole lot when those coins are 100 years old. The trend with the 1932 Washington's is even more dramatic despite a very similar mintage. Here are some values for the 1932-D ans 1932-S Washington's from the same Red Book: 1932-D VG8: $145 1932-S VG8: $140 1932-D AU50: $500 1932-S AU50: $240 1932-D MS65: $24000 1932-S MS65: $6750 As you can see, as the grade increases the 1932-D is far more valuable. This is because the surviving numbers are much lower. Even though 28,800 more 1932-D quarters were minted, it is far rarer today. There is no way to argue that when you look at the numbers.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1932-D Washinton 25c. GRADE & PRICE? Please Help!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...