Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1931-S Lincoln Cent that weighs 3.24 grams -- seeking opinions
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="jfm9561, post: 2619224, member: 78247"]For anyone who is interested, for comparison, below is a photo set of the 1925-D Lincoln Cent I mentioned previously. When I received the 1931-S, the kind of glittery mint color and semi-glossiness of it immediately reminded me of this 1925-D.</p><p><br /></p><p>As I said, the 1925-D came from my grandfather's collection, and he mostly put them in boxes, coin-wrapped many, and for what he apparently thought were the nicest, he put in albums. Although I'm not an expert, given the overall appearance and state of his coins, I have a high level of confidence that he didn't "clean" any of them, either improperly or using acceptable methods of restoration.</p><p><br /></p><p>Full disclosure: many months ago the 1925-D received a bath in Dawn dish soap followed by a rinse and then padded dry. As I mentioned, the collection as a whole survived a basement flood after many years of admittedly improper storage.</p><p><br /></p><p>In a side by side comparison, overall the 1931-S has a more coppery/red color, whereas the 1925-D has a more brassy/gold color. The most notable difference is the 1925-D has a very weak obverse. On the other hand, the reverse is quite nice. On a side note, the 1925-D weighed in at exactly 3.08 grams.</p><p><br /></p><p>With the 1925-D, I tried to replicate as closely as possible the conditions that I used to scan and photograph the 1931-S. Strangely, I was unable to produce quality pictures of the obverse, despite multiple attempts. That weak strike just doesn't seem to catch the lighting very well. On the other hand, the photos of the well-struck reverse came out really nice with just one shot.</p><p><br /></p><p>While I can say for certain that the 1925-D has not been treated with any type of conservation fluid, such as Verdi-care, it did cross my mind that the 1931-S may have received such a treatment. I might give it an acetone bath to see if that makes any difference. Or, I might just leave it at is. The general consensus seems to be that it's a nice coin, so maybe I should leave well enough alone, and just live with the mystery of why it has the strange appearance that it does.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]574296[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574297[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574298[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574299[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574300[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574301[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574302[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574303[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="jfm9561, post: 2619224, member: 78247"]For anyone who is interested, for comparison, below is a photo set of the 1925-D Lincoln Cent I mentioned previously. When I received the 1931-S, the kind of glittery mint color and semi-glossiness of it immediately reminded me of this 1925-D. As I said, the 1925-D came from my grandfather's collection, and he mostly put them in boxes, coin-wrapped many, and for what he apparently thought were the nicest, he put in albums. Although I'm not an expert, given the overall appearance and state of his coins, I have a high level of confidence that he didn't "clean" any of them, either improperly or using acceptable methods of restoration. Full disclosure: many months ago the 1925-D received a bath in Dawn dish soap followed by a rinse and then padded dry. As I mentioned, the collection as a whole survived a basement flood after many years of admittedly improper storage. In a side by side comparison, overall the 1931-S has a more coppery/red color, whereas the 1925-D has a more brassy/gold color. The most notable difference is the 1925-D has a very weak obverse. On the other hand, the reverse is quite nice. On a side note, the 1925-D weighed in at exactly 3.08 grams. With the 1925-D, I tried to replicate as closely as possible the conditions that I used to scan and photograph the 1931-S. Strangely, I was unable to produce quality pictures of the obverse, despite multiple attempts. That weak strike just doesn't seem to catch the lighting very well. On the other hand, the photos of the well-struck reverse came out really nice with just one shot. While I can say for certain that the 1925-D has not been treated with any type of conservation fluid, such as Verdi-care, it did cross my mind that the 1931-S may have received such a treatment. I might give it an acetone bath to see if that makes any difference. Or, I might just leave it at is. The general consensus seems to be that it's a nice coin, so maybe I should leave well enough alone, and just live with the mystery of why it has the strange appearance that it does. [ATTACH]574296[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574297[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574298[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574299[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574300[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574301[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574302[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]574303[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1931-S Lincoln Cent that weighs 3.24 grams -- seeking opinions
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...